On Wed, 08-30-06 9:09 pm
Financial Bankruptcy & Spiritual Bankruptcy
Written by Dr MikeFiled under: Praxis
[13] comments thusfar
A brief magazine article, memories of past readings, and a comment on one of Jollyblogger’s posts brought my mind back to the subject of bankruptcy.
As far back as I can remember in my Christian life, I have heard what I considered to be an over-emphasis on the payment of debts even when debts have been forgiven or dismissed legally. Many of the books I read on Christian financial stewardship stressed this point and most of them pointed to Rom 13.8:
Owe nothing to anyone except to love one another; for he who loves his neighbor has fulfilled the law.” (NASB)
A recent article in Christian Counseling Today by Ron Blue referred to this verse, too. It seems to be a required proof-text for anyone discussing a Christian view of money.
It is instructive, as always, to examine the context of this verse. As the passage shows, verse 8 is not primarily concerned about establishing fiscal policy for Christians but rather stressing the need to love one another:
7 Render to all what is due them: tax to whom tax is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honor to whom honor.
8 Owe nothing to anyone except to love one another; for he who loves his neighbor has fulfilled the law.
9 For this, ‘YOU SHALL NOT COMMIT ADULTERY, YOU SHALL NOT MURDER, YOU SHALL NOT STEAL, YOU SHALL NOT COVET,’ and if there is any other commandment, it is summed up in this saying, ‘YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF.’
10 Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfillment of the law.”
The aforementioned comment makes the valid point that Christians who have “misappropriated” (which is the spiritually correct way to say “stolen”) need to make restitution. If the principle established in the Old Testament is followed, the amount stolen plus an additional twenty percent is to be repaid (Num 5.6-7). The comment is discussing a situation where someone has stolen and has the ability to repay; the same could be said for incurred debt: if the person has the ability to repay, they are to repay.
I am talking about a different situation, one where the individual is in debt but not able to repay for whatever reasons. What always seems to be overlooked, at least in my readings of Christian financial experts, are the principles established in Lev 25. Beginning at verse 8, God explains to Moses the concept of the Year of Jubilee, a command to be observed every fifty years. Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown remark,
This most extraordinary of all civil institutions, which received the name of “Jubilee” from a Hebrew word signifying a musical instrument, a horn or trumpet, began on the tenth day of the seventh month, or the great day of atonement, when, by order of the public authorities, the sound of trumpets proclaimed the beginning of the universal redemption. All prisoners and captives obtained their liberties, slaves were declared free, and debtors were absolved. The land, as on the sabbatic year, was neither sowed nor reaped, but allowed to enjoy with its inhabitants a sabbath of repose; and its natural produce was the common property of all. Moreover, every inheritance throughout the land of Judea was restored to its original owner.” – emphases mine
God was concerned with the rights of land owners and did not want any family or tribe to be perpetually deprived of their land. The land could be sold but it was understood by all that it was a temporary sale: the person could buy it back at any time, a kinsman redeemer could (and should, if possible) purchase it for his kin, or the land would be returned at the Year of Jubilee.
In Deu 15, Moses reveals God’s concern with perpetual or chronic debt among His people. Moses says,
1 At the end of every seven years you shall grant a remission of debts.
2 “This is the manner of remission: every creditor shall release what he has loaned to his neighbor; he shall not exact it of his neighbor and his brother, because the LORD’S remission has been proclaimed.”
This is a remarkable passage, to say the least. Debts were to be forgiven, i.e., not held against the debtor and not to be repaid. In God’s economy, debts could be forgiven and eliminated.
Certainly – and thankfully, I think – we do not live in a theocracy and the laws of the Bible do not dictate the behavior of Christians in such matters. We are to be subject to the laws of the land and, perhaps influenced by the nation’s Christian heritage, the United States does provide escape from debt. If a person has the ability to repay the debt, that is required, although the debt is sometimes lessened or restructured. When an individual is unable to repay, however, the debt is legally discharged and unsecured debt is eliminated.
It has puzzled me over the years why Christian leaders have stressed – almost legalistically at times – that debts have to be repaid no matter what. According to these experts (who often lack theological training), to fail to do so is to sin and reflects spiritual bankruptcy on the part of the person filing. Failure to repay a debt for any reason is sin, and financial bankruptcy is to them irrefutable proof of spiritual bankruptcy. But I question – no, I reject – that conclusion.
God is a God of grace; capitalism knows nothing of grace. When I hear the Christian financial leaders demanding repayment of debts, I hear capitalism drowning out the grace of God.
This is not to encourage financial irresponsibility or deny the stewardship Christians are given with their money. It is, however, to balance the legalistic, capitalistic demands of some that debt always has to be paid. Period.
Certainly if one is financially able to pay a debt, they should do so; in those cases where a person is unable to repay, they should be allowed to apprehend the grace of God made possible through our government without having to bear the stigma of being spiritually bankrupt, too.
Christians need to recognize the need to file bankruptcy as discipline from God and a message to change their relationship to money. At the same time, however, they need to recognize the grace of God and that He is, once again, shown to be a God of new beginnings.
I tried to leave an impassioned comment but it hasn’t shown up.
FoA:
Your impassioned response may have gotten caught by my spam filters. Some “impassioned” words unfortunately get dumped. My apologies.
If you copied it, please feel free to email it to me: I’m pretty sure I can leave any comment I like. So, pro or con, I’ll be happy to post it for you.
Mistaken Emphasis…
Wisdom from Mike at Eternal Perspectives considering bankruptcy of serveral types…….
[...] Wisdom from Mike at Eternal Perspectives considering bankruptcy of serveral types. [...]
I didn’t use any “bad” impassioned words (unless the word “shotgun” used in the context of “the church is only too happy to show up with a shotgun and finish off those who lay bleeding by the side of the road” is a no-no)…LOL I didn’t copy it but I’ll try to rewrite it. And I agree with you, BTW.
Hi Mike,
It’s not clear to me, from a Christian perspective, how to determine when the “not able to pay†period ends. At the age of 25, I may qualify for and receive legal bankruptcy protection, but by the age of 55, I may have numerous assets that can be used to pay past debts. I agree that if you can’t ever pay, you can’t pay, but I’m not sure bankruptcy protection allows a Christian to never pay. Do you believe bankruptcy allows the Christian to walk away from a debt forever?
Since I can’t remember what I had previously written, I would like to point out that:
Most bankruptcies are filed by people emerging from a catastrophic illness or other medical crisis for whom insurance is a luxury they simply cannot afford…OR their insurance has agreed to pay a meager part of the total cost incurred, leaving them with thousands, sometimes tens of thousands of dollars to repay. Many, many Americans are exactly one major health care crisis from precisely that situation. Maybe the majority of the Christian financial advice-givers have the means to repay such a debt, but I assure you that most Christians do not.
(And where is the church? Asleep in the light?)
A large number of bankruptcies are also filed by non-custodial parents (usually women) who simply cannot get the courts to enforce court orders for child support. I know of one such person, who raised her children, by herself, with no help AT ALL from her philandering ex-spouse, and 15 years of medical and dental care, childcare and other expenses(ordinary and extraordinary) finally overwhelmed her income and she was forced into a situation she neither asked for nor caused (no help from the church either). Yet the church is never angry about the ex-spouse who thumbs his nose at the courts and refuses to support his children, or the courts themselves to whom this woman is nothing more than a docket number – no, the church would rather throw stones at this woman who was left to fend for herself and her children for filing for bankruptcy. That’s far easier than offering to actually HELP her (when was the last time you saw a Christian attorney try to help a single mom enforce a court order for child support pro bono)? I have yet to see it.
I may be in danger of making generalizations here but so are people who declare that any and every Christian who has ever walked away from a debt is a sinner. (Hurl the first stone if you dare.) The church has no business condemning ANYONE in light of its overall poor performance in actually looking after the practical needs of the poorest members of the Body of Christ.
The church is glad of the tithe, though, isn’t it – by golly – and for what??? For new seat cushions for lazy Christian butts? For a bigger “recreation hall” for the Christian elite to enjoy???? And there are those among us who must choose between buying food and heating their homes!!! – and let me tell you, I believe things are going to get worse, far worse than they are now in this country, and then what will the church do when the lowest paid among the Body simply cannot make ends meet anymore? Help them or judge them for taking refuge in the only protection available to them?
The clouds are gathering and the finger of doom is writing the story of destruction on the wall before our very eyes and we keep right on eating, drinking, building bigger buildings, busy, busy, busy about what we think is the Lord’s work and extending neither mercy nor grace to those who are hurting – in fact, we ignore them. As it was in the days of Noah…
Do I believe that Christians who spend recklessly with no regard for the consequences, and are able to repay their debt should be absolved of said debt? No I don’t. But those who suffer real tragedy or loss and are financially devastated as a result – well, yes, I believe mercy should be the rule here rather than (as it so often is) the exception.
Mike’s post is a PERFECT example of why I love God and am wary of the church.
David:
Do you believe the seven-year release allowed Jews to walk away and not repay whatever remained on the debt? Do you think you need to pay Christ back for the debt He paid for you?
Forgiveness means it’s no longer charged to your account. If, at some point, one is able to repay then by all means, repay – or, better, help someone else from having to go through bankruptcy.
Pay it forward.
Hi Mike,
It seems to me that a Christian lender has different obligations than a Christian borrower. A Christian borrower does not have a moral right to walk away from a 30 year mortgage after only making payments for 7 years using the Bible as justification. Real people are hurt when loans are not repaid.
The Christian lender does have a moral obligation to only charge a fair rate of interest, be selective in who is lent money, and forgive the debts of borrowers who are not able to repay. Many times a borrower is in much better financial shape than a lender. Some lenders are big banks, but lenders are also small businesses who extend credit to wealthy individuals and other businesses.
It seems unconscionable to me that someone could go on an extended vacation after receiving bankruptcy protection and not repay their gardener or housekeeper who were prevented from collecting payment because of the bankruptcy.
I could never repay my debt to my Lord. However, my relationship with Christ does come with an obligation to sin no more and, if possible, to make amends to those I have hurt.
David:
Mortgage obligations are not generally discharged in bankruptcy. Bankruptcy is a way for the debtor to continue to live in his/her home, make the monthly payments and receive some protection from a creditor who might otherwise have recourse to seize the residence. There are other debts not dischargeable in bankruptcy as well, and if a creditor wants to pursue payment they are free to file a claim with the bankruptcy court. (I’ve helped someone go through this so I’m somewhat familiar with the drill.) Gardeners and housekeepers are employees and wages cannot be withheld from them (to my knowledge) due to personal bankruptcy. Bankruptcy discharges debts, not the obligation to pay wages.
I think it is quite clear that no one condones fiscal irresponsibility on the part of Christians. If one borrows, one should repay. If one misuses or abuses credit, then there are (and should be) consequences.
My heart goes out to those who are between a rock and a hard place financially – those who may have tried hard to do what was right, but were overwhelmed by life’s circumstances. As a person who has had a very high number of MAJOR problems occur in her life for some reason (and I’ve been a follower of Christ for many years), I can personally attest to the fact that some folks simply have an easier time of it than others – why, I don’t know. If I were to list for you the things that have happened to me and my family JUST this summer you would think I’m making it up – never mind the last 20 years! People MARVEL at us and actually say they are glad they AREN’T us! LOL
Maybe this is what has made me so compassionate to the marginalized, the handicapped and helpless. Maybe this is why I tend to want to extend grace to those who are suffering with their child through a terminal illness and they can’t afford to pay the $60,000+ tab and still make ends meet. I think there are shades of gray, and thankfully (unlike some in the Church) the Lord deals with us as individuals in matters that do not pertain to outright sin (the rules are the same for everyone where sin is concerned)…in this as in so many of life’s choices, each individual must strive to hear the voice of God for him/herself.
Have a great weekend.
David:
Aslan’s Friend is right, as far as I understand bankruptcy laws – which isn’t very far at all. Secured debts (such as mortgages, auto loans, and – ready for this? – student loans!) are not discharged. Only unsecured loans or debts (such as credit cards) are eliminated, and then only in Chapter 7 bankruptcies. Chapter 13 restructures but the debts are repaid, but usually without interest.
I had a relative file bankruptcy several years ago. Her husband ran up hundreds of thousands of dollars in credit card debt, having obtained the cards in her name while they were still married. My relative had no way to repay the debt: she owned no property, had minimal employment, and legally could not transfer the debt to her ex where is rightly belonged.
If I were I legalist, I suppose I would say she “has to repay” since she is a Christian (although, oddly, we would probably grant nonbelievers more grace). But I’m not a legalist and I understand, I think, God’s heart and mind on such matters. His revelation of Himself to us in the bible is overflowing with grace and forgiveness and, as I argued in the post, there is ample evidence in the OT that He was concerned about chronic debt.
You are correct, sadly, that some people abuse the bankruptcy laws. Should we therefore deny the benefit to those who legitimately need it and have tried to be fiscally responsible? God’s grace is abused every day by Christians – including you and me – but I don’t see Him withdrawing His grace towards us. And if I have been forgiven so much, how can I object when others are forgiven so insignificant a thing as money?
(Here’s a remarkable fact: when someone files for bankruptcy and their debts is eliminated, they are immediately flooded with offers for – you guessed it! – more credit cards! I don’t know of VISA or MC or any of the others are insured against such losses, but they sure seem invested in getting people back into debt once again! Want to help fix the problem? Get a law passed that denies anyone who has filed for bankruptcy the right to have credit cards for a minimum of seven years. That would change things!)
But I digress.
If Mt 18.21-35 teaches nothing else, it teaches forgiveness of debts. If we abuse that grace, God will deal with us in His time. But the grace and forgiveness remain.
Hi Mike and Friend of Aslan,
Good comments both. Thank you for your time and effort.
Whether legally protected or not, we all have debts beyond financial we could never pay. Forgiveness is the Christian way, as is the obligation to not burden others. Pharisees are as hard to get rid of as ants. : -)