<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dan: &#8220;Make Love, Not War&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eternalperspectives.com/2006/01/05/dan-make-love-not-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eternalperspectives.com/2006/01/05/dan-make-love-not-war/</link>
	<description>. . . searching for sanity in a Christian culture gone mad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:40:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim from OldTruth.com</title>
		<link>http://eternalperspectives.com/2006/01/05/dan-make-love-not-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim from OldTruth.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 22:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eternalperspectives.com/?p=295#comment-1443</guid>
		<description>Mike said: &quot;&lt;em&gt;If this seems like a rant against Reformed bloggers, itâ€™s not meant to be&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

Wow!  You really don&#039;t think so?


&lt;em&gt;Jim:

Sorry about taking so long to approve your comments: from now on yours should get posted immediately.  I&#039;m really bad about paying attention to &quot;comments awaiting moderation&quot;: I had 26 sitting there!

To answer your question, no, I don&#039;t consider it a rant.  I care about my Reformed brothers in Christ and believe there is an endemic problem infecting many in the denomination, i.e., the inability or refusal to check for logs in their own eyes before scrutinizing the rest of us.  Now, don&#039;t get me wrong: I know I have blind spots, too - and, of course, some of the Reformed folks are kind (I mean that) enough to point them out.  But when I or others try to reciprocate, we&#039;re labeled derogatorily and dismissed.  See, for example, Phil&#039;s total misrepresentation of me in his post &lt;a href=&quot;http://phillipjohnson.blogspot.com/2006/01/why-cessationism-discussion-may-be-non.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and my response &lt;a href=&quot;http://eternalperspectives.com/2006/01/10/mirror-mirroron-the-wall/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

No one - Reformed, Charismatic, Arminian, Dispensational, or whatever - is beyond constructive criticism.  Too often, however, criticism of a Reformed believer turns into a &quot;shoot the messenger&quot; situation.  

To paraphrase and completely rip Paul out of context, I would answer any questions about my motives with, &quot;Why? Because I do not love you? God knows I do!&quot;

And I do.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike said: &#8220;<em>If this seems like a rant against Reformed bloggers, itâ€™s not meant to be</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow!  You really don&#8217;t think so?</p>
<p><em>Jim:</p>
<p>Sorry about taking so long to approve your comments: from now on yours should get posted immediately.  I&#8217;m really bad about paying attention to &#8220;comments awaiting moderation&#8221;: I had 26 sitting there!</p>
<p>To answer your question, no, I don&#8217;t consider it a rant.  I care about my Reformed brothers in Christ and believe there is an endemic problem infecting many in the denomination, i.e., the inability or refusal to check for logs in their own eyes before scrutinizing the rest of us.  Now, don&#8217;t get me wrong: I know I have blind spots, too &#8211; and, of course, some of the Reformed folks are kind (I mean that) enough to point them out.  But when I or others try to reciprocate, we&#8217;re labeled derogatorily and dismissed.  See, for example, Phil&#8217;s total misrepresentation of me in his post <a href="http://phillipjohnson.blogspot.com/2006/01/why-cessationism-discussion-may-be-non.html">here</a>, and my response <a href="http://eternalperspectives.com/2006/01/10/mirror-mirroron-the-wall/">here</a>.</p>
<p>No one &#8211; Reformed, Charismatic, Arminian, Dispensational, or whatever &#8211; is beyond constructive criticism.  Too often, however, criticism of a Reformed believer turns into a &#8220;shoot the messenger&#8221; situation.  </p>
<p>To paraphrase and completely rip Paul out of context, I would answer any questions about my motives with, &#8220;Why? Because I do not love you? God knows I do!&#8221;</p>
<p>And I do.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bowden</title>
		<link>http://eternalperspectives.com/2006/01/05/dan-make-love-not-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>Bowden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 19:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eternalperspectives.com/?p=295#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>Mike:
It&#039;s really good to see you blogging again.  Good thoughts from a unique perspective (I liked your thoughts the other day about how one&#039;s pscyhology informs theology).

&quot;never met a fight they didn&#039;t like...like little boys on a playground.&quot;  The thing I remember about the playgound  is  that we really fought mostly with our friends.  Like some kind of sibling rivalry where I feel free to mistreat my little brother, but no one else can.  People who think vastly different than us are written off  as not worth our effort. But we&#039;ll argue to  the death with those who are just almost on the same page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:<br />
It&#8217;s really good to see you blogging again.  Good thoughts from a unique perspective (I liked your thoughts the other day about how one&#8217;s pscyhology informs theology).</p>
<p>&#8220;never met a fight they didn&#8217;t like&#8230;like little boys on a playground.&#8221;  The thing I remember about the playgound  is  that we really fought mostly with our friends.  Like some kind of sibling rivalry where I feel free to mistreat my little brother, but no one else can.  People who think vastly different than us are written off  as not worth our effort. But we&#8217;ll argue to  the death with those who are just almost on the same page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pseudo-Polymath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Morning Links</title>
		<link>http://eternalperspectives.com/2006/01/05/dan-make-love-not-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator>Pseudo-Polymath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Morning Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 15:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eternalperspectives.com/?p=295#comment-1441</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike Russell at Eternal Perspectives thinks the christian bloggers should be less contentious when discussing doctrinal differences. For my part, I guess I don&#8217;t hang out in the right corners too see the heated action and on the up-side can&#8217;t compare to the wars of the Reformation, eh? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike Russell at Eternal Perspectives thinks the christian bloggers should be less contentious when discussing doctrinal differences. For my part, I guess I don&#8217;t hang out in the right corners too see the heated action and on the up-side can&#8217;t compare to the wars of the Reformation, eh? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
