On Tue, 07-26-05 12:29 pm
Hi, my name is Mike and I’m a blogaholic.”
(Altogether now) - “Hi, Mike!”
I did something over the weekend I’ve needed to do for a long time: I pared my list of blogs to visit. Yes, I recognize that this is considered a sign of backsliding by some (Baptists), loss of blogging by others (Arminians), and proof that I never really was a blogger to begin with (Reformed RSDEPers - that just doesn’t roll off the tongue like TULIP, does it?). But it was necessary.
I was spending far too much time in two activities: writing posts for a small but appreciative (usually) audience; cruising and reading the blogs of almost every believer who’s ever had at least one good post. So I cut it down, from maybe 20-25 regularly frequented blogs + 25-30 occasionally read blogs to a mere 10. And, as far as posting on my own blog goes, I’ve decided not to come up with posts or react to what else is being said unless the Muses truly come upon me. (Can I refer to “Muses” and still be a Christian?)
I know the visits to Eternal Perspectives will decrease even more than they already have (I average what now? 30 or so a day?) but so what? It’s not like there’s going to be a huge hole left in cyberspace - which, come to think of it, is really nothing more than a hole anyway. I’d rather read the 10 blogs I’ve settled on and maybe make a comment from time to time. Or send an email for an even more surreptitious influence. And wait for the Muses.
I must admit, though, that I’ve been more than a little discouraged by what seems to generate traffic. If I were to engage in some select sycophancy or narcissistic ranting, I’m sure I could improve my numbers. Or if I were to intentionally become controversial, adversarial, and unorthodox - in pretense, of course - my numbers would likely jump. Being a suck-up or a whipping boy = big numbers most of the time. If you’ve been around the BoG for awhile, you know who’s who.
What discourages me more, however, are the posts that don’t generate traffic or comments: the ones that are about books of the Bible (like the series I did on Jonah) or theological matters (such as the attributes of God). Those, I suppose, just result in yawns and quick clicks to other, more temporal posts. I’ve never been much for “what’s happening now.” There seems to be a ubiquitous disdain or disinterest in exegesis, exposition, or theology - not that I’ve done a whole lot of that. The lack of interest discourages me.
Maybe it’s just me, but I’d rather read someone’s ideas about the Book of Romans than about the nascent church and its afterbirth. I’m a Bible or theological nerd, I guess.
For those of you who care about such things, I have kept my links to all the good blogs out there so don’t be concerned about your TTLB numbers dropping by a total of 1. I’ll visit from time to time when something of interest grabs me - I still scan the BoG several times a week.
So that’s where I am: trying to get the blogging monkey off my back and to return to some semblance of a real, personal, tactile life. Oh, wait: I’ve never had that kind of life anyway! Well, to get back to whatever.
Thanks for stopping by.
July 26th, 2005 at 2:48 pm
Hey, I loved your series on Jonah, the occassional posts on Calvinism, the Systematic Theology you sent. For a while I spent reading through your testimony and going through your backlog of posts and, indeed, I check your site everyday. I just felt really dumb if every day I would post “great post” or telling you that I had a notebook that I would jot something else I had to study because of what you wrote. Only a few guys on the blogosphere do that for me. You, Jeremy Pierce, Eric Svendson from Real Clear Theology Blog. Some other brothers and sisters motivate me by rubbing elbows against me but you guys it’s some genuine good reading and on all of those sites I rarely comment because to my own ears (fingers) I sound like a fankid.
So there you have it. You will be missed every day I don’t see a post.
July 26th, 2005 at 3:18 pm
From one Bible nerd to another, spot on chap. “Confessional blogging” has taken a turn for the worst (in most cases). Now, I know that you are weaning your self off of the e-heroin of blog reading, but since you mentioned Romans, I happen to have just started some ramblings on that very book… ok, so actually it is on the nature of salvation, but I am using Romans 1-8 as my base text… although not in order… Ok, so I will stop rambling on now. Oh ya, I like what you have to say, even if I am new to this who thing… I will have to check out your Jonah series… anyways, Blessings in the Lord!
July 26th, 2005 at 3:49 pm
I am on the same path, actually, I am about to disconnect the internet altogether. If I felt led of God to do this, I would like to think I would.
July 26th, 2005 at 4:08 pm
Rick:
I don’t think God spends too much time leading us to unplug, blog, comment, or anything else. I think He gives us a brain, His word, His Spirit, and holds us accountable and responsible. We will have to give an account - not for where He led us but - for what we have done with the time and talents He has given us.
I wish you well on your journey. Thanks for coming by.
July 26th, 2005 at 8:47 pm
I can’t say I agree with you on that. The steps of a righteous man are ordered by the Lord. Also if we are led of the Spirit, we are the sons of God. Too much bible for me to believe God just pushes us in and says, “Sink or swim.” Doesn’t the Open Theist teach along those lines???
July 26th, 2005 at 9:10 pm
Bloglines says you currently have 14 subscribers through their service, one of whom would be me. I have no plans to unsubscribe.
Thanks for a good post.
July 26th, 2005 at 9:35 pm
Rick:
“Doesn’t the Open Theist teach along those lines???”
Gee, I don’t know. Why don’t you tell me everything you know about open theism and how that relates to God’s omniscience, sovereignty, and foreknowledge - and then you can tell me why you imply that I’m an “open theist.” This despite my posts that discuss my understanding of proginosko as more than foresight.
Study Rom 8 and “led by the Spirit” - which has to do with realm transfer, not individual guidance - and then explain why you proof-texted it and applied it here.
While you’re at it, explain the Hebrews’ understanding of walking in righteousness and their understanding of the role of the Spirit of God in that process. Did they conceptualize the spiritual life in a manner consistent with what you are advocating, or did life, spirit, and torah mean something different?
Whether you agree with me or not is so insignificant and unimportant as to be laughable. What does matter is whether you or I are “rightly dividing the word of truth” or just flailing about wildly without a clue as to what the Bible really says.
Then let’s talk, eh?
July 26th, 2005 at 9:42 pm
Wow, were you grinding your teeth when you were writing that??? Anyways, if I wrote a 14 volume set on my understanding of those things I doubt you would give me credit. I did not call you an open thiest, I said, “Doesn’t the Open Theist teach along those lines???”
I think you have some issues.
P.S. You can put out the torch, I won’t bother you again.
July 26th, 2005 at 9:46 pm
One more thing, and then I will leave. You wrote:
“Whether you agree with me or not is so insignificant and unimportant as to be laughable.”
It was obviously significant eneough to get your goose.
July 26th, 2005 at 11:40 pm
Come on Rick, no reason to misrepresent Mike. He’s been one of the most solid voices on the blogosphere and the least likely to get into an online wrestling match.
July 26th, 2005 at 11:55 pm
Only funnin’, I don’t want any wrestling. He can delete all my comments if he wants. It won’t hurt my feelings at all.
July 27th, 2005 at 6:50 am
Mike, I wish you well in your recovery!
I read your blog when you post, and I enjoy it. You were one of the first bloggers to critque one of my posts (The Kingdom Of God Is Avancing)and I learned a lot from it!
I wouldn’t be to hasty to stop your writing, I am certain that many enjoy it, even though they don’t comment, doesn’t mean they don’t like it, and after all you won a Warnie!
That is no mean feat!
You have a unique focus on your blog and I for one have reaped the benefit, be encouraged my friend, you have encouraged me and many others, and I have also seen your comments around the blogs, and they are entertaining to say the least!
GBYAY
July 27th, 2005 at 7:02 am
Here’s the thing:
For too long I - maybe “we,” but I won’t speak for Christendom in general since I’ve no aspirations to being a high priest - have tolerated people who drop theological “hot phrases” and employ them like four-letter words.
And, Rick, if you were capable of writing 14 volumes on open theism or anything else, then I would give you credit whether I agreed with you or not (e.g., I give N.T. Wright credit for being a bonafide scholar even though I do not agree at all with his “new perspective” on Paul or his idea of covenantal nomism. And I am concerned about his pervasive influence in the churches and the detrimental effect he’s having.).
On the other hand, if you could or would write 14 volumes on something we wouldn’t be having this discussion, would we?
Do I have issues? You bet. One of them is that I tend to let people say irresponsible things and give them the benefit of the doubt when I should call them up short. One of my issues is not, however, intellectual laziness or parading my ignorance around like it’s a crown I’ll wear in heaven some day. I’m trying to be discerning and wise; I want to be transformed my the renewing of my mind, which includes my intellect.
Without question a lot of harm has been done to and in the name of Christ by intellectuals. But can you name any lasting good that has been done by non-intellectuals? Wesley, Calvin, Luther, Edwards, and others in the Western Christian tradition were intellectually informed and astute. Whether you know or admit it or not, you are indebted to them.
No, I was not “grinding my teeth” when I wrote my second response to you. Actually, I was pretty calm and in a good mood. But I do have a passion for God’s reputation and do not suffer foolish criticism or misrepresentation of Him in silence. There are a lot - a whole lot - of things for which I can be legitimately criticized, but nothing you have mentioned is one of them.
Finally, why would I want to delete your comments? They speak volumes about you, not me; my posts and comments do the same for me. For better or worse.
July 27th, 2005 at 7:07 am
Thanks, John.
One other thing, Rick, FWIW: agreement between two Christians is, comparatively speaking, laughable. I chose the word deliberately, as I did with “unimportant” and “insignificant.” I have friends that agree with me on a huge number of things, but that doesn’t give me solace. The only opinion that matters is God’s and it is by His standard that we all are measured.
For the record: I don’t have a “goose” for you to get, although you might have a chance at “getting my goat.” Except I don’t have a goat, either.
July 27th, 2005 at 9:22 am
You may not get wide readership (neither do I), but you write high-quality stuff, and those who read your blog appreciate that, I suspect.
In your AA-style opening, BTW, you beat me to a technique I was going to use on my blog (and still will, actually). I’m a recovering blogstats addict. But I’ve been clean for six weeks. I haven’t so much as looked at my standing on The Blogdom of God, The Truth Laid Bear, Christian Top 1000 or Site Meter.
I’ve enjoyed blogging a whole lot more since I’ve not been worrying about numbers. I hope you do too, brother.
BTW, as I recall, Transforming Sermons did link to your Jonah series. Peace.
July 27th, 2005 at 1:21 pm
Mike, I love coming by your blog and others like yours because I’m incapable of producing anything like it. I write on my blog much like I write in the newspaper — informal, opinionated, culturally current, much of it tongue-in-cheek. I basically write to entertain myself. However, I’d hate to think anyone such as you, who’s actually making a real contribution to “God blogging,” would disappear! I’m among those 30 in your audience who drops by every day (multiple times, some times) to see what you’ve posted.
God bless whatever you decide to do.
July 27th, 2005 at 2:58 pm
Just waiting on the Muses . . .
July 27th, 2005 at 5:12 pm
Mike,
So your smarter than I am. And you can belittle people with your brilliance. Do you think this will be your crown in heaven? Whatever you have was given to you by God, so I don’t think you should be so proud of it.
My comment on being led of the Spirit is not peculiar unto me. Many people have lived and taught a life led of God, even in very small aspects of their life.
I am not capable of writing a 14 volume set on anything. I am not wearing my ignorance as a crown, I do not love the fact that I am not a great thinker. I am just a man who has been given something he doesn’t quite understand, and from the looks of things, neither does anyone else.
But we most agree on one thing (not that you care), God shall be the final judge. This is a most comforting and terrifying thought.
July 27th, 2005 at 6:02 pm
Rick:
Whether I am smarter than you or not, I do not know: I don’t even know for sure that I have done more with my intellect than you have. My point is this: we have been entrusted with many talents, our intelligence being one. To neglect it is not a good thing. That’s my point.
I have read some of your posts at your blog and you do seem to exhibit an anti-intellectual attitude; if I am wrong, I apologize.
I am not suggesting, either, that your position on being “led by the Spirit” is novel; I am suggesting that there are other ways to understand that phrase.
Mark Twain said something to the effect that a man who doesn’t read good books is no better off than the man who can’t read good books. Reading the books of biblical scholars is like taking classes from them or listening to their sermons. Is that a bad idea? I don’t think so.
I don’t know if your playing the “humility card” is genuine or not. If not, then don’t do it; if so, then that is a sad state of affairs, since it means that I believe in you more than you do yourself. I am - and have been - arguing that you are capable of more than you think. I seem to have more confidence in you than you do.
You can do whatever you want with that, but I think it’s true, i.e., I think you are selling your self short and settling for less than what you could be.
July 27th, 2005 at 7:44 pm
Mike,
“I have read some of your posts at your blog and you do seem to exhibit an anti-intellectual attitude; if I am wrong, I apologize.”
I am not anti-intellectual, what I am against is the thought that only the “intellectual” can get any good out of the bible. What I am against is men using their “itellect” as a crutch. Men of old, who were great thinkers, and godly men, are not what I am against. What I am against, is all the fluff and nothing else. If a person can exegete every scripture properly, and does not have the fire of God burning within, what’s the use. This is what I am trying to say.
I personally have a library of over 200 books (not very many by most standards) and I read constantly. I have read books by reformed writers. I have read books by Arminians (I don’t know if that is spelled right). I have read contemporary writers, and writers of old. Some refered to as mystics, others as bible scholars. My favorites are Moody, Ravenhill, Murray, Torrey, Bunyan, Schaeffer, Wurmbrand, Tozer, and on and on. These men move me, they get thinking, they inspire me to pray, they make me hunger for revival.
I love to read thought provoking literature, but I like to see the fire of God illuminate the page. If it does not, then I wonder what good it is at all.
“I don’t know if your playing the “humility card” is genuine or not. If not, then don’t do it; if so, then that is a sad state of affairs, since it means that I believe in you more than you do yourself. I am - and have been - arguing that you are capable of more than you think. I seem to have more confidence in you than you do.”
I’m not playing anything. Unless I am being sarcastic or joking, which I usually follow with one of these
, I mean every word I write with everything I have. I am a passionate man, and emotional, not a good combination when trying to reason through something I know. But nevertheless, I am what I am. I desire to be sharper, Torrey said something like this, “I’ve seen rather dull-minded individuals become mentally sharp by grinding their minds against God’s word.” This is my desire, as I am sure it is yours. What I am advocating, nothing more nothing less, is that it is God’s word that does the sharpening, not the teaching of other men. It would be like sharpening the lawn mower blade with the instructions of the grinder and not the grinder. The instructions are of much importance, and greater achievments can be had by following them. But to get in there and actually use the grinder is the only way to sharpen the blade. (I know this is crude, but it is kind of what I am saying in a nutshell.)
If you have any confidence in me whatsoever, you def. have more than I do. I think the difference is; I know me better than you know me.
“You can do whatever you want with that, but I think it’s true, i.e., I think you are selling your self short and settling for less than what you could be.”
What I shall do is this; Thank you for some kind words, and even a hint of encouragement.
I feel much better about leaving our discussion like this. Not because I want to have the last word, but that I think we are at better peace between one another. I want to do more with what God has given me. I hope I do. I hope that you also do much with what God has given you; inspire some under achievers out there, you have the intellect to do this.
There are those out there that have lost all hope with Christianity, because they see more thinking than doing. People like you are not only capable of doing, but thinking also, this is a great combo. May God’s peace be with you.
P.S. As far as accusing you of Open Theism, I wasn’t. And touching the “tell me what you know about it”, all I can say is this; I have a dear family member who holds to this system of thought. I have personally talked with him for over 100 hours, I would say, about salvation and things like that. So as far as knowing all the in’s and out’s, I don’t. But as for seeing the effects of it on someone you love; I do.
July 28th, 2005 at 11:54 pm
Mike,
I appreciate that my blog was one of the ones to survive the purge. Thanks for your support.