<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defining Legalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eternalperspectives.com/2005/06/08/defining-legalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eternalperspectives.com/2005/06/08/defining-legalism/</link>
	<description>. . . searching for sanity in a Christian culture gone mad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 09:01:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josiah</title>
		<link>http://eternalperspectives.com/2005/06/08/defining-legalism/comment-page-1/#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator>Josiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eternalperspectives.com/2005/06/08/defining-legalism/#comment-1060</guid>
		<description>For a new believer, I&#039;d say there are a couple variations of legalism.  

One is when people try to get in good with God by what they do.  (Justification by works.)

Another is when people focus on the letter of the law rather than the spirit of the law.  Basically, that&#039;s when we focus on a list of do&#039;s and don&#039;ts rather than looking at the underlying reasons/issues.

Not with a new believer, but withsome more exposed to American Christianity, I might sarcastically comment that the third variation known as legalism goes like this: 


If you don&#039;t like a stance someone else takes regarding holy living, no matter how much they base it on spirit rather the letter and back it up with Scripture--if you don&#039;t like it, you call them a legalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a new believer, I&#8217;d say there are a couple variations of legalism.  </p>
<p>One is when people try to get in good with God by what they do.  (Justification by works.)</p>
<p>Another is when people focus on the letter of the law rather than the spirit of the law.  Basically, that&#8217;s when we focus on a list of do&#8217;s and don&#8217;ts rather than looking at the underlying reasons/issues.</p>
<p>Not with a new believer, but withsome more exposed to American Christianity, I might sarcastically comment that the third variation known as legalism goes like this: </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like a stance someone else takes regarding holy living, no matter how much they base it on spirit rather the letter and back it up with Scripture&#8211;if you don&#8217;t like it, you call them a legalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candleman</title>
		<link>http://eternalperspectives.com/2005/06/08/defining-legalism/comment-page-1/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Candleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 02:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eternalperspectives.com/2005/06/08/defining-legalism/#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>Gothardisim.

{{{Candleman}}}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gothardisim.</p>
<p>{{{Candleman}}}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milton Stanley</title>
		<link>http://eternalperspectives.com/2005/06/08/defining-legalism/comment-page-1/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>Milton Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eternalperspectives.com/2005/06/08/defining-legalism/#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>Legalism is thinking we&#039;ll be saved for what we do right instead of what God has done for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legalism is thinking we&#8217;ll be saved for what we do right instead of what God has done for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
